Get in touch
The consultation on our draft regional plan is now closed, but you can contact us with any queries in the following ways
- Using the 'Ask us a question' tool on this and the other pages of this website.
- Emailing us via contact@wrse.org.uk.
The consultation on our draft regional plan is now closed, but you can contact us with any queries in the following ways
- Using the 'Ask us a question' tool on this and the other pages of this website.
- Emailing us via contact@wrse.org.uk.
Ask us a question
Please give us your question and we'll respond with an answer as soon as we can.
-
Building an ill conceived reservoir, with no realistic chance of it ever being filled, and the danger of areas being flooded, is not the answer to leaking pipes. Fixthe pipes, erradicate all leaks, and then do a feasibility check
Marius Malan asked about 1 year agoHello Marius, thank you for your comment. We completely agree that fixing leaks is essential, which is why our regional plan sets out how water companies do just that to reduce demand for water across the south east. At the same time, we need to provide new sources of water to supply a growing population and combat some of the effects of climate change, which is why our plan sets out a number of new reservoirs, including the Havant Thicket reservoir in Hampshire and the South East Strategic Reservoir Option (SESRO) in Oxfordshire. If you'd like to know more about a particular reservoir we've proposed, do let me know and I'd be happy to point you in the direction of more detail on what we're planning and the reasons behind this.
-
Why have you totally ignored inclusion of the Cotswold Canal in your plans? No mention of it whatsoever. A huge reservoir at Abingdon will never be built, so why do you keep trying for it?
PWJ asked about 1 year agoDear PWJ,
We considered a range of options in the development of the plan, including the Severn Thames Transfer which used part of the restored Cotswold Canal as part of the transfer solution.
Further modelling and sensitivity runs have been completed to assess the need for this option in the future, which showed that the Severn Thames Transfer is not required at this time, so does not feature in the regional plan, but may be needed in future if other options cannot be progressed or if the anticipated demand management savings are not achieved in full.
sesro,sttsesro stt -
If DEFRA are, on one hand, curtailing the abstraction of surface water and The National Infrastructure Commission (NIC) are, on the other hand, 'challenging' the water utility companies to source an extra 1 million litres per day, from where else, other than desalination, can this gap be filled? [NB: Recycling doesn't come close] If desalination is a nailed-on, must have solution to water security, especially for the South-East, what can be done to improve this discredited, destructive, unaffordable utility? Ron Daniel, Founder & CEO of TELESIS SYNERGY SYSTEMS
rsd7556 asked almost 2 years agoThank you for taking the time to read our proposed regional plan and ask this question. The proposed plan for he South East would be to use a mixture of solutions to meet the challenges of the future and not just desalination. In the table below you can see how we are planning to meet these challenges by 2050.
Option type
Volume (Millions of litres per day, or Ml/d)
Percentage contribution to solution
Demand management
791.5
34.6%
Drought intervention
291.4
12.7%
Reservoir
236.4
10.3%
Direct river intake
200.8
8.8%
Transfer into region
193.9
8.5%
Recycling
177.1
7.7%
Other
148.5
6.5%
Desalination
144.1
6.3%
Groundwater
64.3
2.8%
Trading
26.6
1.2%
Catchment
8.5
0.4%
Infrastructure
5.5
0.2%
Sum
2288.6
100.00%
So, in response to your question - yes, the gap can be filled through a combination of solutions and we believe this proposed set of solutions offers the best value for customers and the environment.
With regard to the second part of your question, about the perception and use of desalination as a solution in the future in the UK. We are aware that desalination is used in many places around the world including Jersey, the Isles of Scilly and London, and therefore operating these types of solution in a temperate climate, where the demand and availability of water can fluctuate so much, is possible, albeit that it provides a number of challenges.
The existing solutions have found ways to meet the strict environmental obligations that are required and have used energy sources which are from renewable sources. When we constructed the draft plan, we did also factor in the de-carbonisation of the grid which reduces the operational carbon footprint of these schemes, as well as looking at up and coming membrane solutions which could require less energy to be used as part of the process.
These factors, coupled with the option appraisal process, which considered approximately 140 different desalination options (sites and sizes) across the South East, has provided sufficient evidence that these solutions could be built and operated in the region, albeit that their operation will be more complex that current treatment solutions customer and companies are used to.
-
Why do none of the rivers in the south east have registered bathing water areas?
Mary Parker asked almost 2 years agoWolvercote Mill Stream in our region was designated a bathing water in 2022. This is the second time this has ever happened for a UK river.
Any river can become designated and the Bathing Water Regulations 2013 outline the process of identifying bathing waters in England and Wales. Local authorities usually apply for designation and must support, but anyone can apply.
Local authorities must support all applications. Landowners must support applications for privately owned sites.
There are a number of criteria that must be met for a bathing water to become designated and more information on this can be found at: Bathing waters: apply for designation or de-designation - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk).
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends